Managing agent reviewing year-end service charge accounts for a residential block

    Service charges - guide

    What Is a Service Charge Balancing Charge?

    Why year-end balancing charges arise, when they may be payable, how surpluses are dealt with, and what leaseholders and directors should check before money changes hands.

    Short answer

    A service charge balancing charge can arise when leaseholders have paid estimated service charges on account but the development's actual recoverable expenditure for the year is higher than the amount collected. Each leaseholder may then be asked to contribute their lease proportion of the deficit. However, the charge is not automatically payable merely because the accounts show a shortfall. The lease, the validity of the demand, statutory time limits, the reasonableness of the costs and any applicable consultation requirements must all be considered.

    What is a service charge balancing charge?

    Most residential leases allow service charges to be collected in advance, using an estimated annual budget. Leaseholders pay their share of that estimate on account, usually in one or two instalments, so the development has money available to pay for services as they are delivered.

    After the financial year ends, the actual qualifying expenditure is established and the year-end service charge accounts are prepared. Where the actual recoverable expenditure is higher than the amount collected on account, the difference is commonly described as a deficit, a balancing charge or a balancing payment. Each leaseholder's share is normally worked out using the proportion or apportionment set out in their lease.

    Terminology varies between leases and between managing agents, so the label matters far less than the mechanism. The contractual starting point is always the lease: it is the lease that says whether money can be collected on account, how the year-end adjustment is calculated and when any balancing payment becomes due.

    One point of confusion is worth clearing up straight away. In tax, a "balancing charge" is an unrelated capital-allowances adjustment that can arise when an asset is sold or otherwise disposed of. That has nothing to do with the residential service charge reconciliation described here.

    A simple worked example

    Estimated annual expenditure
    £40,000
    Actual qualifying expenditure
    £44,000
    Total deficit
    £4,000
    Leaseholder's contribution proportion
    5%
    Potential balancing charge
    £200

    £4,000 × 5% = £200

    This example is illustrative only and does not use figures from any development we manage. Whether the £200 would actually be recoverable would still depend on the lease, the expenditure itself, the demand and the applicable statutory requirements.

    Why do balancing charges arise?

    A budget is a forecast made before the year begins. Some variance is normal, and the most common causes are practical rather than sinister.

    Energy and insurance increases

    Communal electricity, heating or buildings insurance renewing above the figure assumed in the budget.

    Emergency or unplanned repairs

    A roof leak, lift breakdown, drainage failure or door-entry fault that could not sensibly have been predicted.

    Contract price increases

    Cleaning, gardening, maintenance or contractor rates rising during the year.

    Additional compliance work

    Fire risk assessment actions, remedial testing or new inspection requirements arising mid-year.

    Under-budgeting

    A budget rolled forward from last year rather than rebuilt from recent actual expenditure.

    Timing and late invoices

    Invoices for work done in one year arriving after the budget for that year was set.

    A balancing charge does not, by itself, prove mismanagement or overcharging. Costs move, and buildings occasionally need work that nobody could have anticipated. What is worth looking at is the pattern: repeated or substantial deficits may suggest that budgeting assumptions, in-year monitoring, communication with leaseholders or reserve planning should be reviewed.

    Does the lease permit the balancing charge?

    This is the first question, and leases differ widely. Depending on how yours is drafted, it may govern:

    • Whether payments can be collected on account at all.
    • The service charge year and the accounting period.
    • The categories of expenditure that can be recovered.
    • How costs are apportioned between leaseholders.
    • How the accounts must be prepared, certified or audited.
    • The method and timing for calculating a deficit or surplus.
    • The date on which a balancing payment becomes due.
    • How any surplus must be handled.
    • Whether additional demands can be made during the year.
    • The permitted purposes of a reserve or sinking fund.

    Lease-dependent: no two service charge clauses are guaranteed to work the same way, so a mechanism used in one block cannot be assumed to apply to another. East Valley Properties provides practical block management information, not lease interpretation or legal advice. Where the wording or the validity of a charge is disputed, take advice from a specialist leasehold solicitor.

    What happens when there is a surplus?

    The reconciliation can just as easily run the other way. Where actual expenditure is lower than the amount collected on account, the year end may produce a surplus, sometimes shown as a balancing credit.

    How that surplus is treated again depends on the lease. It might be:

    • Credited against the following year's service charges.
    • Returned to the leaseholders who contributed.
    • Retained or transferred for a purpose the lease expressly permits.
    • Applied to a reserve fund, where the lease allows that.

    None of these approaches applies universally, and a surplus is not a windfall. Service charge contributions held by the landlord, RMC or RTM company are generally held on trust under section 42 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, so the money remains tied to the purposes for which it was collected rather than being available for the general use of the landlord, the company or the managing agent.

    Can the reserve fund be used to cover the deficit?

    It is a fair question, and the honest answer is that it depends. Reserve and sinking funds are normally collected for the purposes the lease permits, typically future major works or cyclical items, and they should not be treated as an unrestricted operating float simply because the current account is short.

    Whether a deficit can properly be met from reserves turns on the lease wording and on the purpose for which the reserve was collected. Using reserve money also does not cure a separate problem: if a demand was invalid, or a statutory requirement was missed, moving money between funds does not fix that.

    Equally, it would be wrong to say reserves can never be applied. Directors of RMCs and RTM companies should take accounting or legal advice before reallocating reserve money where the lease position is uncertain, and should record the reasoning. Our guide to service charge bank accounts and reserve funds covers how these balances should be held and reported.

    The section 20B 18-month rule

    Section 20B of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 places a time limit on recovery. In plain terms, relevant costs are generally not recoverable through the service charge if more than 18 months have elapsed since they were incurred, unless within that period the leaseholder was notified in writing that the costs had been incurred and that they would subsequently be required to contribute to them through the service charge.

    Some careful qualifications matter here:

    • This is an 18-month rule. It is not a six-month rule, and it is not a universal deadline that applies to every step in the process.
    • Do not assume a cost was incurred on the first day of the service charge year. The relevant date is when that particular cost was incurred.
    • The legal date on which a cost is treated as incurred can depend on the facts and on the relevant authorities.
    • Issuing year-end accounts does not necessarily, on its own, satisfy every requirement, and a section 20B(2) notification is not a substitute for the demand requirements in the lease and in statute.

    Where the timing is close or already in dispute, this is a point to take specialist legal advice on rather than to work out from a summary. You can read the current text of section 20B on legislation.gov.uk.

    Consultation and reasonableness still apply

    Describing expenditure in the year-end accounts, or wrapping it into a balancing demand, does not remove the other statutory protections that apply to service charges.

    Under section 19 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, relevant costs are generally recoverable only to the extent that they were reasonably incurred and, where they relate to works or services, that those works or services were of a reasonable standard.

    Separately, qualifying works or qualifying long-term agreements may have required consultation under section 20 and the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003. A balancing charge does not retrospectively remove a consultation requirement that applied at the time, and a failure to consult can limit what is recoverable unless the Tribunal grants dispensation. Whether consultation was required at all is fact-specific, and our Section 20 notices guide explains the thresholds and stages in more detail.

    What should a leaseholder check?

    If you have received an unexpected balancing charge, work through the documents before reaching a conclusion.

    • The relevant provisions of your lease, including the service charge machinery.
    • The original estimated budget for the year.
    • The year-end service charge accounts.
    • How the deficit itself has been calculated.
    • Your percentage or contribution proportion under the lease.
    • Significant differences between budgeted and actual expenditure.
    • Whether the expenditure relates to services that are recoverable under the lease.
    • Whether consultation may have been required for the works or agreement concerned.
    • The date the relevant costs were incurred.
    • The date of the demand, and of any section 20B(2) notification.
    • Whether the demand includes the information required by law and the correct landlord name and address.
    • Whether credits, earlier payments and reserve-fund movements have been reflected correctly.

    Leaseholders also have statutory rights to request a written summary of relevant costs and, having followed the applicable process, to inspect the accounts, receipts and other supporting documents. Those rights operate within the framework and timescales set by sections 21 and 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as they apply, rather than entitling a leaseholder to any document, immediately, in whatever format they choose. The Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE) publishes free official guidance on how these rights work in practice.

    Can a balancing charge be challenged?

    Yes. The kinds of question that can properly be raised include:

    • Whether the lease permits the charge at all.
    • Whether the calculation and apportionment are correct.
    • Whether the cost falls within the services that are recoverable.
    • Whether the expenditure was reasonably incurred.
    • Whether the works or services were of a reasonable standard.
    • Whether any applicable consultation requirement was met.
    • Whether section 20B affects recovery.
    • Whether the demand itself is valid, including the landlord details required by sections 47 and 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 and the summary of rights and obligations required by section 21B of the 1985 Act.

    The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) can determine whether a service charge is payable and, where relevant, by whom, to whom, in what amount, on what date and in what manner.

    What we would not suggest is simply ignoring the demand. An unpaid charge can build into arrears and lead to recovery action, so raise the issue in writing promptly, keep paying anything that is not in dispute where you can, and take advice from a specialist leasehold solicitor if the matter escalates.

    How directors can reduce unexpected balancing charges

    Deficits cannot be eliminated entirely, but surprises usually can. Most of the work sits in the budgeting and monitoring cycle rather than at year end.

    • Build budgets from recent actual expenditure rather than simply repeating last year's figures.
    • Obtain renewal estimates and contractor pricing early, before the budget is finalised.
    • Monitor actual spend against budget through the year rather than only at year end.
    • Report material variances to directors as soon as they appear.
    • Tell leaseholders promptly when significant unforeseen expenditure arises.
    • Maintain appropriate reserves where the lease permits them.
    • Complete year-end accounts and reconciliations promptly.
    • Diarise section 20B and other relevant deadlines.
    • Keep operating account and reserve fund records clearly separated.
    • Make sure demands and notices follow both the lease and the statutory requirements.
    • Take legal advice before issuing unusual, late or already disputed demands.

    This is routine work for a managing agent. If you are reviewing how your development is run, our service charge management and RTM company management pages explain how we handle budgets, reconciliations and reporting, and our published block management pricing sets out what that costs. Directors weighing up a move can also read our guide to changing managing agent.

    Concerned about your development's budget or managing-agent fees?

    RMC, RTM and share-of-freehold directors can send us their current service-charge budget and managing-agent fee information for a free initial review. We will highlight costs that may need clarification, potential omissions and areas where the management arrangements could be improved.

    Request a Free Budget Health Check

    Preliminary document review only. Not a statutory audit, legal opinion or certification of the service-charge accounts.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When to seek professional advice

    Most questions on this topic are management questions rather than legal ones, and the two are worth separating. A managing agent can tell you how something works day to day and what it will cost. A solicitor tells you what your rights are and how a Tribunal is likely to view them.

    Speak to a managing agent when

    • You want next year's budget rebuilt from actual expenditure rather than rolled forward.
    • Year-end accounts and reconciliations are running late and need bringing back on schedule.
    • You need in-year monitoring and variance reporting so deficits are flagged early.
    Request a free block review

    Take specialist legal advice when

    • The lease wording on the year-end adjustment or apportionment is unclear or disputed.
    • The timing of a balancing demand may engage section 20B.
    • A leaseholder is challenging payability, or a Tribunal application is in prospect.

    East Valley Properties provides management expertise, not legal advice. Where a matter turns on the wording of your lease or on formal proceedings, we will say so and work alongside your solicitor.

    Primary sources

    The official material behind this guide. We summarise it in plain English rather than reproducing it.

    Please note: this guide is general information about residential block management and is not legal, accounting or auditing advice. Whether a particular balancing charge is payable depends on the lease and the facts. Take advice from a specialist leasehold solicitor or a suitably qualified accountant before relying on anything set out here.

    Written by Romain Maillard - Director, East Valley Properties

    Romain manages residential blocks and estates for RTM companies, residents' management companies, share of freehold developments and freeholders across East London and Essex.

    Published

    Readers also ask

    Related articles

    Service Charges

    Late Service Charge Demands: Why the Dates in Your Lease Matter

    An Upper Tribunal decision confirms that where a lease sets a timetable for service charge demands, missing the deadline can affect recovery - and why that is not the same as the 18-month rule.

    Read guide
    Changing Managing Agents

    How to Choose a Managing Agent for Your Block

    A due-diligence framework for RTM and RMC directors and freeholders: the selection process step by step, a printable 22-point comparison checklist, how to compare fees and credentials properly, and how to take useful references.

    Read guide
    Building Safety

    New Cladding Funding for Buildings Under 11 Metres: What RMC and RTM Directors Need to Know

    New government funding for unsafe cladding on eligible residential buildings under 11 metres in England: who may qualify, why a FRAEW is essential, who can apply and the 9 October 2026 deadline.

    Read guide
    Ask the Expert

    Have a Question About Your Building?

    Whether you're an RTM Director, RMC Director, Freeholder or Leaseholder, our experienced block management team is here to help.

    If your question could help other property owners, we may publish an anonymised version of the answer in our Knowledge Centre.

    0/3000

    We never publish personal information. Answers are always anonymised.

    Need advice sooner?

    Book a free consultation with East Valley Properties to discuss your building, service charges, compliance or managing agent requirements.

    Book a ConsultationRequest a Management Proposal