
Leasehold guidance
Recent Tribunal decisions have clarified an important question for landlords, RTM Companies and Residents' Management Companies. Here's what it means for your building.
Speak to Our TeamSection 20 consultation is triggered by the qualifying works themselves, not by the professional fees attached to them. Recent Tribunal decisions have generally treated a surveyor's or architect's fee for specifying and administering major works as a professional cost rather than “works to a building”.
Those fees still have to be reasonable and recoverable under the terms of the lease. But in most cases it is the underlying works, not the professional fee, that determines whether consultation is required.
Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 requires landlords to consult leaseholders before carrying out qualifying works or entering into long-term contracts that affect service charges.
Works costing any single leaseholder over £250, or long-term agreements over £100 per leaseholder per year.
A Notice of Intention, followed by a Notice of Estimates, with a 30 day response window at each stage.
Fail to consult and recovery is capped at the statutory thresholds - regardless of the actual cost.
More background: Section 20 Notice Explained. For smaller resident-managed blocks, we use tiered Section 20 administration fees based on the value of the works - see our block management pricing.
Professional fees are charges paid to specialists who advise on, design or oversee works to your building - separately from the contractor who carries out the physical works.
Building and structural surveys, specifications and cost planning.
Structural, mechanical or electrical engineering advice.
Design work, planning applications and building regulations.
Coordinating trades, programme and reporting to directors.
Fire risk assessments, remediation strategies and compliance.
Certifying payments, variations and completion under a building contract.
The First-tier Tribunal has confirmed the direction of travel that professional fees are treated differently to physical works when it comes to Section 20 consultation.
A well-run major works project follows a clear sequence. Professional input up front leads to better tenders and fewer surprises later.
Scoping, budgeting and phasing works programmes with reserve fund advice.
Notices of Intention, Estimates and Award managed to the statutory timetable.
Independent tender packs, contractor selection and transparent comparisons.
Payment certificates, variations, retention and final accounts.
Clear updates so leaseholders understand scope, cost and timescale.
Fire safety, building safety and lease-recovery checks throughout.
The question directors actually need answered is not whether a fee is technically qualifying expenditure, but how to consult in a way that no one can pick apart later.
Assuming Section 20 always applies to professional fees
Consultation is triggered by the qualifying works. Whether a fee is caught depends on what it is for and how it is charged, not on its size alone.
Appointing the surveyor after the notice of intention
The specification then lags the consultation, and the estimates end up describing a different scope from the one leaseholders were consulted on.
Hiding the fee inside the works figure
It reads as concealment even when it is not. A separate, clearly stated fee attracts far fewer challenges.
Relying on a verbal fee agreement
Without a written scope and fee basis, a reasonableness challenge is difficult to answer years later.
Most questions on this topic are management questions rather than legal ones, and the two are worth separating. A managing agent can tell you how something works day to day and what it will cost. A solicitor tells you what your rights are and how a Tribunal is likely to view them.
East Valley Properties provides management expertise, not legal advice. Where a matter turns on the wording of your lease or on formal proceedings, we will say so and work alongside your solicitor.
The official material behind this guide. We summarise it in plain English rather than reproducing it.
The consultation requirement itself, and the Tribunal's power to dispense with it.
The notice stages, timescales and content requirements for each type of consultation.
Read the decisions on qualifying expenditure directly rather than through commentary.
Written by Romain Maillard - Director, East Valley Properties
Romain manages residential blocks and estates for RTM companies, residents' management companies, share of freehold developments and freeholders across East London and Essex.
Published
An Upper Tribunal decision clarifies how much detail a Section 22 preliminary notice must contain before leaseholders apply for a Tribunal-appointed manager under Section 24.
Read guideAn Upper Tribunal decision confirms that where a lease sets a timetable for service charge demands, missing the deadline can affect recovery - and why that is not the same as the 18-month rule.
Read guideA recent Upper Tribunal decision means RTM Companies may, in the right circumstances, apply to vary outdated lease provisions that prevent effective building management.
Read guideWhether you're an RTM Director, RMC Director, Freeholder or Leaseholder, our experienced block management team is here to help.
If your question could help other property owners, we may publish an anonymised version of the answer in our Knowledge Centre.
Book a free consultation with East Valley Properties to discuss your building, service charges, compliance or managing agent requirements.
Speak with East Valley Properties for practical advice before your project begins. We help directors plan properly, consult correctly and appoint the right professionals for the job.