Building safety professional inspecting the external wall and cladding of a UK residential apartment building

    Building Safety Act

    Building Safety Act: What Counts as Cladding Remediation?

    Recent Tribunal guidance confirms that making a building safe may involve more than simply replacing external cladding. Here's what RTM Companies and RMC directors need to know.

    Key takeaway

    Making a building safe may involve more than replacing external cladding. External walls are systems rather than single materials, and how a fçade performs depends on several elements working together.

    For leaseholders, RTM companies and RMCs, that means the scope of remediation work is shaped by the wall system as a whole, not only the visible cladding panels.

    Why Was the Building Safety Act Introduced?

    The Act is the product of a decade of reform. The path from Grenfell to today's leaseholder protections runs through five key steps.

    1. 1

      Grenfell

      A tragedy that exposed serious failings in high-rise fire safety.

    2. 2

      New legislation

      Government commits to reform of building safety and remediation.

    3. 3

      Building Safety Act

      New duties, funding routes and a Building Safety Regulator.

    4. 4

      Stronger leaseholder protections

      Qualifying leaseholders shielded from many remediation costs.

    5. 5

      Safer residential buildings

      A framework for identifying and fixing relevant safety risks.

    Is Cladding the Only Issue?

    External walls are systems, not single materials. A safe façade depends on how several elements work together.

    Cladding

    The outer façade panels most commonly associated with remediation.

    Fire Stopping

    Seals around service penetrations that stop fire spreading between compartments.

    Cavity Barriers

    Barriers within wall cavities designed to slow the spread of fire and smoke.

    Balconies

    Combustible balcony structures and finishes can create additional risk.

    Insulation

    Behind-the-panel insulation may itself be combustible and require attention.

    External Wall Systems

    The wall as a whole system, not just the visible outer skin.

    The Tribunal's Decision

    In plain English

    Remediation under the Building Safety Act is not limited to replacing the visible cladding. Where additional works are necessary to address a relevant building safety risk - such as fire stopping, cavity barriers or supporting elements - they can properly form part of the remediation.

    • Scope follows the risk. The right question is what makes the wall safe, not which layer is on the outside.
    • Investigations matter. A proper PAS 9980 appraisal, and often intrusive opening-up, is essential before scoping works.
    • Leaseholder protections apply. Directors must respect the Act's cost-recovery rules when planning remediation.

    What This Means

    For RTM Directors

    • Better project planning. Scope the whole wall system before committing to works.
    • Professional investigations. Rely on PAS 9980, FRAEW and intrusive surveys - not guesswork.
    • Long-term compliance. A well-planned project keeps the block compliant for years, not months.

    For Leaseholders

    • Improved building safety. Works are scoped around the risks that actually matter to residents.
    • Statutory protections. The Building Safety Act limits what qualifying leaseholders can be asked to pay.
    • Greater clarity. You should receive clear information about the scope, funding and timeline.

    Professional Assessments

    Serious remediation decisions rest on competent, independent assessment. These are the specialists and assessments a well-run project typically involves.

    PAS 9980

    The industry standard for assessing fire risk from external walls.

    FRAEW

    Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls - the technical output of a PAS 9980 assessment.

    Fire Risk Assessment

    The building-wide FRA covering communal areas, escape routes and controls.

    EWS1

    External Wall System certificate used by lenders where required.

    Structural Engineer

    Advice on load-bearing elements, brackets and structural implications.

    Fire Engineer

    Bespoke fire-safety strategies where a standard approach isn't enough.

    Intrusive Surveys

    Opening up sections of the wall to confirm build-up and defects.

    How East Valley Properties Helps

    Building Safety Advice

    Practical guidance on duties, funding routes and leaseholder protections.

    Major Works

    Planning and running remediation projects from scoping to completion.

    Consultant Coordination

    Managing surveyors, fire engineers and specialists as one project team.

    Leaseholder Communication

    Clear, honest updates so residents understand what's happening and why.

    Compliance Management

    Ongoing fire safety, building safety and statutory compliance for the block.

    Project Oversight

    Independent oversight of costs, timescales and contractor performance.

    We coordinate specialist consultants, run the project transparently and keep leaseholders informed at every stage - so directors are never left carrying the technical detail alone.

    What does this mean in practice?

    Building safety work is won or lost on record-keeping and sequencing long before anyone appoints a contractor.

    If you are one of the rtm directors

    • Establish what the external wall is actually made of, in writing, before debating who pays. Assumptions about the build-up are the usual source of cost surprises.
    • Keep every survey, intrusive inspection and fire risk assessment in one place with dates. This is the first bundle any funder, insurer or buyer's solicitor asks for.
    • Treat interim measures - alarms, waking watch, compartmentation repairs - as a live budget line, not an emergency spend.

    If you are one of the rmc directors

    • Check whether the building falls within the higher-risk category before assuming which regime applies.
    • Make sure the fire risk assessment actions have owners and dates. Open actions with no owner are the pattern we see most often on takeovers.

    If you are one of the freeholders

    • Scope surveys around the wall as a system, including cavity barriers and insulation, rather than the visible panel alone.
    • Record what was investigated and what was not. A partial survey presented as a full one causes problems later.

    If you are one of the leaseholders

    • Ask what has been physically inspected rather than inferred from drawings.
    • Ask which funding routes have been explored before any service charge contribution is proposed.

    Common mistakes

    • Treating the cladding panel as the whole problem

      An external wall performs as a system. Replacing the visible layer while leaving barriers or insulation unresolved can leave the building no safer.

    • Relying on drawings instead of opening up the wall

      As-built rarely matches as-drawn. Where budgets have gone badly wrong, the cause is usually a build-up nobody verified.

    • Letting fire risk assessment actions stay open

      An assessment with unclosed actions is evidence against you. Each action needs an owner, a date and a completion record.

    • Starting remediation before funding routes are checked

      Some costs are recoverable elsewhere. Committing service charge money first can close doors that were open.

    When to seek professional advice

    Most questions on this topic are management questions rather than legal ones, and the two are worth separating. A managing agent can tell you how something works day to day and what it will cost. A solicitor tells you what your rights are and how a Tribunal is likely to view them.

    Speak to a managing agent when

    • You need a compliance schedule that shows what is due, when, and who is responsible.
    • Fire risk assessment actions have built up and need closing out in a defensible order.
    • You need remediation and interim measures reflected properly in the budget and reserves.
    Request a free block review

    Take specialist legal advice when

    • Liability for remediation costs between freeholder, developer and leaseholders is in dispute.
    • You are dealing with leaseholder protections, remediation orders or contribution orders.
    • An enforcement notice or a formal claim has been received.

    East Valley Properties provides management expertise, not legal advice. Where a matter turns on the wording of your lease or on formal proceedings, we will say so and work alongside your solicitor.

    Primary sources

    The official material behind this guide. We summarise it in plain English rather than reproducing it.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Written by Romain Maillard - Director, East Valley Properties

    Romain manages residential blocks and estates for RTM companies, residents' management companies, share of freehold developments and freeholders across East London and Essex.

    Published

    Ask the Expert

    Have a Question About Your Building?

    Whether you're an RTM Director, RMC Director, Freeholder or Leaseholder, our experienced block management team is here to help.

    If your question could help other property owners, we may publish an anonymised version of the answer in our Knowledge Centre.

    0/3000

    We never publish personal information. Answers are always anonymised.

    Need advice sooner?

    Book a free consultation with East Valley Properties to discuss your building, service charges, compliance or managing agent requirements.

    Unsure about your building's safety obligations?

    Our experienced team works alongside specialist consultants to help RTM Companies and Residents' Management Companies understand their responsibilities and manage building safety projects with confidence.