Expert Answers
    RTM
    2 September 2026

    What Can Leaseholders Do If They Are Concerned About How an RTM Company Is Being Run?

    Leaseholder reviewing service charge paperwork and correspondence at a kitchen table.
    The question - from a leaseholder

    I own a flat in a block managed by a right to manage company. I am not happy with how the building is being managed and I am not getting clear answers. What can I actually do, and in what order?

    Short answer

    Leaseholders should normally begin by putting their concerns to the RTM directors in writing and requesting a clear response. Their next options will depend on whether they are members of the RTM company, what information they are seeking and how serious the alleged management failures are. Possible steps include exercising service-charge information rights, using company-member rights, requesting a general meeting, proposing an independent management review or, in serious cases, considering an application for a Tribunal-appointed manager. The correct procedure and evidence are important, and legal advice may be needed.

    Start by identifying the concern

    Concerns about a right to manage (RTM) company usually fall into recognisable groups, and the right response depends on which group you are in:

    • dissatisfaction with communication, such as slow or unclear replies;
    • concerns about service charge expenditure, for example the level or basis of a cost;
    • missing or incomplete accounts;
    • procurement or insurance concerns, such as how contractors or the policy were selected;
    • failure to maintain or insure the building;
    • compliance or safety concerns, including fire safety and statutory testing;
    • disagreements with the RTM directors about decisions they are entitled to take;
    • concerns about the managing agent appointed by the RTM company;
    • serious or persistent management failures.

    Disagreeing with a decision does not by itself prove mismanagement. Directors are allowed to make judgement calls that some members dislike, provided they act within the lease, the articles and their duties. Separating a preference from a genuine failure will save time and keeps your position credible.

    Confirm who is responsible for what

    Six roles are easy to confuse:

    • the RTM company holds the management functions acquired under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 and is the body legally responsible for exercising them;
    • the RTM directors run the company and take management decisions on its behalf;
    • members of the RTM company hold company law rights, such as voting at general meetings;
    • the managing agent is a contractor appointed by, and acting on the instructions of, the RTM company;
    • the landlord or freeholder retains ownership and any functions that did not transfer;
    • individual leaseholders hold rights under the lease and under service charge legislation.

    The practical consequence is that a managing agent normally takes instructions from the RTM company, not from an individual leaseholder. An agent can and should handle repair reports and ordinary resident enquiries, but it cannot usually give one leaseholder access to confidential company records without the RTM company's authority. See whether an individual leaseholder can contact the managing agent.

    Check whether you are actually a member of the RTM company

    Owning a qualifying flat does not automatically make you a member of the RTM company. Membership normally follows a separate step, and it matters, because it affects rights relating to company meetings, voting, company information, appointing or removing directors, and requiring the directors to call a general meeting.

    Check the company's articles of association and its register of members before relying on any company law right. Most RTM companies adopt the prescribed model articles made under the RTM Companies (Model Articles) (England) Regulations 2009, although you should read the version actually filed for your company. There is more detail in our answer on seeing an RTM company's register of members.

    Put the concerns in writing, proportionately

    A calm, specific letter or email achieves far more than a long list of grievances. A good written approach:

    • identifies each concern separately, with dates;
    • attaches supporting documents where you have them;
    • asks specific questions rather than general ones;
    • requests a response within a reasonable period;
    • avoids unsupported allegations about individuals;
    • proposes practical remedial actions the board could take.

    Keep a copy of everything. If matters later escalate, the written trail is usually the most valuable evidence you have. Where directors do not reply at all, see what leaseholders can do if RTM directors refuse to respond.

    Request the right information from the right route

    Different documents sit under different rights, and asking through the wrong route is a common reason for a refusal:

    • service charge summaries and supporting documents are dealt with under sections 21 and 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985;
    • company accounts filed at Companies House are publicly available;
    • the RTM company's statutory registers are governed by the Companies Act 2006;
    • board minutes and internal correspondence are company records, and there is no general leaseholder right to them;
    • managing agent records belong to the agent's client, the RTM company;
    • personal data belonging to other residents is restricted by data protection law.

    No leaseholder has an unrestricted right to every RTM or managing agent document. Our answers on inspecting an RTM company's accounts and invoices and on inspecting service charge invoices explain the sequence.

    Consider proposing an independent review

    An RTM board may decide, voluntarily, to commission an independent review of governance and decision making, service charge controls, budgets and expenditure, procurement and contractor management, insurance arrangements, repairs and compliance monitoring, or managing agent performance. Boards sometimes welcome this, because an outside view can settle a dispute that internal correspondence cannot.

    An individual leaseholder does not automatically have a general right to require the RTM company to commission or pay for a wide-ranging independent audit. The company's approval will also usually be needed before its managing agent releases confidential company information to an external reviewer. See can a leaseholder demand an independent review.

    Use company member rights where they apply

    If you are a member of the RTM company, company law may give you routes that a non-member does not have. At a high level, qualifying members may be able to:

    • request access to the register of members for a proper purpose under section 116 of the Companies Act 2006;
    • require the directors to call a general meeting under section 303, where the statutory threshold of members is met;
    • propose resolutions for consideration at a general meeting;
    • vote on the appointment or removal of directors, subject to the Companies Act 2006 (including the section 168 procedure) and the company's articles.

    None of this allows one leaseholder to appoint themselves as a director or to remove the board unilaterally. These are collective procedures with formal requirements, and they should be followed carefully.

    Consider whether the managing agent should change

    Where the real problem is the performance of the agent rather than the directors, the cleanest remedy is often a change of agent. That is a decision for the RTM company, taken in accordance with the management agreement and its notice and termination provisions, the company's articles, and any board or member approval requirements.

    Our answer on whether an RTM company can change managing agent sets out how boards usually approach it, and our guide to changing managing agent covers the handover.

    Section 24 as a last resort

    Where serious management failures remain unresolved, a qualifying person may be able to apply to the First-tier Tribunal for the appointment of a manager under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. That route can be available even where an RTM company currently manages the building.

    It is not a shortcut. In practice:

    • appointment is not automatic;
    • a statutory ground under section 24 must be established;
    • evidence is required, not assertion;
    • the Tribunal must also be satisfied that appointment is just and convenient;
    • a preliminary notice under section 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 will normally be required first;
    • that notice must identify the alleged failures and the remedial steps required;
    • the respondent must normally be given a reasonable opportunity to put matters right;
    • the Tribunal has power to dispense with the preliminary notice in appropriate circumstances, but this should never be assumed;
    • proceedings can be time consuming and expensive, and success does not necessarily mean every cost is recovered.

    Read more on Tribunal appointed management, on Section 22 preliminary notices, and on whether Section 24 can be used against an RTM company. If you are unsure which Section 22 applies to you, our answer on the two types of Section 22 notice explains the difference.

    When professional advice is needed

    Take legal advice before you consider removing directors, serving a statutory notice, pursuing disputed company records, alleging breach of duty, applying to the Tribunal, seeking to recover costs, or formally challenging service charges. Take advice urgently where safety, insurance cover or the security of service charge funds is in question. Directors themselves may also want to read our answer on RTM and RMC director personal liability.

    If your building is not yet under an RTM company and you are researching the process, see our guidance on Right to Manage.

    This page provides general information about property management in England and is not legal advice. The appropriate steps will depend on the lease, the RTM company's articles, company membership, the available evidence and the circumstances of the building.

    Important qualifications

    • Whether a company law right is available to you depends on whether you are a registered member of the RTM company, not simply on owning a flat.
    • Service charge information rights depend on who is entitled to enforce payment of the service charge under the lease.
    • The scope of any right is affected by the lease, the company's articles and the facts of the case.
    • Tribunal outcomes involve discretion, so no result can be predicted from the strength of a complaint alone.

    Practical steps

    1. Identify and document the concerns, separating preferences from alleged failures.
    2. Confirm whether you are a member of the RTM company and read the articles.
    3. Raise the concerns formally with the RTM board in writing.
    4. Use the appropriate information right for the document you actually need.
    5. Ask for a meeting, or propose a resolution, where that is appropriate.
    6. Propose a proportionate independent review of the management.
    7. Consider whether the managing agent should be changed.
    8. Obtain specialist legal advice if serious failures remain unresolved.
    9. Consider Section 24 only where the evidence and statutory grounds justify it.

    Need an independent management assessment?

    East Valley can review the operational management of an RTM or resident-controlled development, subject to access to the relevant records and authority from the company. We provide management and operational observations, not legal advice.

    Request an Initial Assessment

    What this means in practice

    The right next step depends on your role in the building. The list below sets out what each group can usefully do when concerns are raised about how an RTM company is being run.

    If you are one of the leaseholders

    • Write to the directors with dated, specific concerns and a request for a response within a reasonable period.
    • Check whether you are a registered member of the RTM company before relying on company law rights.
    • Use section 21 and 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for service charge documents rather than asking for everything at once.

    If you are one of the rtm directors

    • Respond in writing, even where you disagree, and record the reasons for decisions.
    • Consider whether a proportionate independent review would resolve the dispute more cheaply than litigation.
    • Check the management agreement if the concerns relate mainly to the agent's performance.

    If you are one of the rmc directors

    • Apply the same governance discipline: minute decisions, publish budgets and answer questions on the record.
    • Confirm which company records members are entitled to see before refusing a request.
    • Take advice before any step involving removal of a director.

    If you are one of the freeholders

    • Remember that management functions acquired by the RTM company sit with that company, not with you.
    • Keep your own records of what did and did not transfer on acquisition.
    • Take advice before intervening in a dispute between the RTM company and its members.

    Common mistakes

    • Treating disagreement as proof of mismanagement

      Directors are entitled to make decisions that some members dislike. Focus on what was required and what was actually done.

    • Assuming that owning a flat makes you an RTM member

      Membership is a separate step. Check the register of members before relying on company law rights.

    • Asking the managing agent for company records

      The agent's client is the RTM company. Confidential company information normally needs board authority before release.

    • Jumping straight to a Tribunal application

      A preliminary notice under section 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 is normally required, and evidence of a statutory ground is essential.

    • Mixing every complaint into one long letter

      Separate, dated and evidenced points are far easier for a board to answer and far more useful if matters escalate.

    When to seek professional advice

    Most questions on this topic are management questions rather than legal ones, and the two are worth separating. A managing agent can tell you how something works day to day and what it will cost. A solicitor tells you what your rights are and how a Tribunal is likely to view them.

    Speak to a managing agent when

    • Reviewing budgets, accounts and contractor arrangements to see whether costs are properly controlled.
    • Checking whether compliance documents such as fire risk assessments and testing records are current.
    • Assessing the performance of the managing agent against the management agreement.
    • Improving reporting so directors and members can see how money is spent.
    Request a free block review

    Take specialist legal advice when

    • Removing or appointing directors.
    • Serving any statutory notice.
    • Pursuing disputed company records.
    • Alleging breach of directors' duties.
    • Applying to the First-tier Tribunal.
    • Seeking to recover costs.
    • Formally challenging service charges.

    East Valley Properties provides management expertise, not legal advice. Where a matter turns on the wording of your lease or on formal proceedings, we will say so and work alongside your solicitor.

    Primary sources

    The official material behind this guide. We summarise it in plain English rather than reproducing it.

    Running or setting up an RTM company?

    We act as managing agent for RTM companies across Greater London and Essex, covering service charge accounting, compliance and contractor management on fixed fees.

    Answered by Romain Maillard - Director, East Valley Properties

    Romain manages residential blocks and estates for RTM companies, residents' management companies, share of freehold developments and freeholders across East London and Essex.

    Published

    This answer has been anonymised. Personal details, addresses and company names have been removed. Guidance is general and does not replace advice from a solicitor or surveyor on your specific block. East Valley Properties is a managing agent, not a firm of solicitors or legal advisers.

    Ask the Expert

    Have a Question About Your Building?

    Whether you're an RTM Director, RMC Director, Freeholder or Leaseholder, our experienced block management team is here to help.

    If your question could help other property owners, we may publish an anonymised version of the answer in our Knowledge Centre.

    0/3000

    We never publish personal information. Answers are always anonymised.

    Need advice sooner?

    Book a free consultation with East Valley Properties to discuss your building, service charges, compliance or managing agent requirements.